On Relationship Requests, Boundaries, and Freedom

‍ ‍Relationship Requests vs. Boundaries

Sometimes, we want—or need—something to change in our relationship.  We want a partner to do more of X or stop doing Y.  Once you are clear on what it is you want, the next step is to offer a relationship request—a clear, direct, ask for what you want.

While a boundary is something about you, for you, and within your control (i.e. what you will or will not do to take care of yourself), a relationship request, by contrast, is a clear ask for another person to do (or not do) something based on a desire of yours, while leaving them free to respond as they wish.  A skillful request is inherently relational, inviting partners into the work of navigating differences and, when possible, discovering options that work for both people. A boundary, on the other hand, involves looking within yourself and figuring out what you need to do to take care of you. Neither relationship requests nor boundaries are about controlling the other person, though a refused request or an enacted boundary may involve a relational cost. Both relationship requests and boundaries are essential relational skills.

A Skillful Relationship Request

Relationship requests communicate to others what is important to us, what we value, and how we wish to be loved, valued, and respected.  The idea of relationship requests comes from Non-Violent Communication (Rosenberg, 2015).  A skillful relationship request:

  • Focuses on what you want rather than what you don’t want

  • Is clear, specific, and actionable

  • Conveys that the other person has freedom to choose how they respond  

After the Request

Handling a “Yes”: If you hear a yes to your request (or a qualified yes, i.e. “not this, but how about this instead”), pause and take this in. You might feel some anxiety about getting what you want, but overall, this is a moment to savor.   

Handling a “No”: You can handle a no to a relationship request without shutting down, guilt-tripping your partner, or becoming resentful; in fact, a no can lead to enhanced intimacy and connection.

The first step is internal:  practice not taking the no personally or as a rejection of you.  This internal work involves the mentalization neural network-- a network of brain systems that supports our capacity to reflect on our own inner experience and the inner experience of others.  When this network is working well, you are able to slow down when you hear a no and realize it exists separate from you, not immediately interpreting it as a threat, rejection, or lack of care.  Under stress, which can happen when a difference emerges around a relationship request, this network tends to go offline (Luyten & Fonagy, 2015). 

Here are some internal regulation tools to try, in addition to common ones like getting fresh air, exercise, becoming still and listening inward, or strategic distraction:

  • Mantra:  Tell yourself “This no is a gift of information about my partner.  It’s not about me or something that is wrong with me, it’s about where they are right now.” 

  • Imagery:   Ask your mentalization neural network to generate an image for you that knows what’s about you/not about you and that knows it is safe to allow someone to have a different experience from you without trying to change it (Shore, 2023). 

Keep it Relational after Hearing No: Connect through Imagination and Validation

Hearing a no to a relationship request does not have to mean the end of the connection.  Try to think about the topic from your partner’s perspective and imagine what is going on for them.  Validate that (Rosenberg, 2015).  For instance, you could try saying, “I imagine you might feel stressed about the overflowing laundry hamper; is that why you’re not interested in hiking with me tomorrow?”...Once you understand accurately what’s going on for your partner (which can take some back and forth), warmly validate it with language such as “that makes a lot of sense.”  You don’t have to have to agree to validate--try to convey that your partner’s position makes sense from their frame of reference.

Understanding what is blocking your partner’s yes often provides a trailhead to what really matters for your partner--what precious thing they might be trying to protect and what they are fighting for.  If you can connect with this part of your partner, you have the beginning of a different, deeper conversation.  Curious questions (with no other agenda than to understand your partner better) can help.  You could ask questions such as, “How would it feel for you if the laundry was all caught up this weekend? Is there something we could work on together to help you have that experience?”  Try to stay open to their perspective, experience, and desires—there might be a way that the dream underneath both your request and their no could coexist in a creative way.

Kasia Urbaniak also describes a parallel simple 3-part strategy--locate, approve, and influence—that supports people staying in connection after hearing no in order to get to a deeper and truer understanding of what both people are fighting for and where they can join in this (Urbaniak, 2021).  

When a “No” Stands

Sometimes, despite a fully functioning mentalization neural network, imagination, validation, and deep understanding of what both people are fighting for, the answer to the relationship request is still no, and a common ground that both people can feel good about is nowhere to be found—and that’s okay.  For instance, this can happen  with high-stakes issues such as moving, having a child, or sexual needs in a monogamous arrangement.    

Know that it was brave to make a request in the first place, and it is also brave to give an authentic no to a request from someone you love.   A true, honest no is hard, but it’s cleaner and more clarifying than a yes given grudgingly or without follow-through.

Note for the Partner Saying No

It is very difficult to be in the role of giving a no to a relationship request from an important person in your life. Most partners I work with deeply want to please their partner, and saying no is an act of courage.

If you are giving a no, it can help to clarify whether it comes from a lack of willingness (“I don’t want to”/”this just isn’t me”) or lack of capacity (“I feel I can’t right now”).  Sharing this context with your partner can be a gift of vulnerability that preserves connection even during a hard moment.

One common pitfall to avoid is shutting down (which is different from taking a mindful pause). Try to keep it relational. Keeping it relational sounds like, “It matters to me that you want this even though I can’t say yes right now. I want to work toward a solution that is good for both of us. Or, I can’t talk more about this right how, but I’d like to continue the conversation when I’ve had a chance reflect and feel a little more grounded.” Shutting down sounds like, “No. This conversation is over. Don’t bring this up again. You’re making a big deal out of nothing.” Choosing not to talk about the topic further is, of course, your choice and a boundary (specifically, your choice not to engage further is a boundary), and this choice will likely carry a relational cost.

For the Requestor: Practicing Boundaries After a “No”

When a relationship request isn’t met with a yes, check in with yourself to figure out what you can do to take care of yourself with integrity. This act of care is your boundary—it answers the question of what am I going to do to take care of myself now that I have this gift of information from my partner?  A boundary isn’t about controlling your partner, it’s about taking care of you while leaving your partner free.  However, it can be a kind of line drawn in the sand, and sometimes it will involve relational cost. Check in with yourself to make sure you’re not using the boundary to retaliate, punish, or withhold from your partner.  Accessing compassion for yourself and your partner can help you discern.

Making relationship requests and practicing boundaries are ongoing skills. Each request, each yes, and each no is an opportunity to exercise courage, self-reflection, imagination, and empathy.  By combining internal work with clear communication, you strengthen both yourself and your relationships, moving toward more authentic connection and intimacy.

References

Luyten, P., & Fonagy, P. (2015). The neurobiology of mentalizing. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment6(4), 366-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/per0000117

Rosenberg, M. B.  (2015). Nonviolent communication: A language of life.  3rd. ed.  PuddleDancer Press.

Shore, J. T. (2023).   Setting boundaries that stick:  How neurobiology can help you rewire your brain to feel safe, connected, and empowered.  New Harbinger Publications, Inc.

Urbaniak, K. (2022). Unbound: A woman’s guide to power. TarcherPerigee.

‍ ‍

Next
Next

Perceptual Incongruence:  Future-Proofing Your Relationship (Part IV)